🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-A6-9500-vs-Intel-Celeron-J1800

AMD A6-9500 vs Intel Celeron J1800

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD A6-9500 and Intel Celeron J1800

AMD A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J1800 is manufactured by Intel. AMD A6-9500 has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J1800's 2.4 GHz. AMD A6-9500 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J1800's 2.6 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2). Intel Celeron J1800 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD A6-9500's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD A6-9500 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron J1800 uses the FCBGA1170 socket. AMD A6-9500 was launched in Q4 2016, while Intel Celeron J1800 was launched in Q1 2014. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD A6-9500 and Intel Celeron J1800 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD A6-9500 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J1800 runs at 2.4 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD A6-9500 supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to 2.6 GHz for the Intel Celeron J1800.
  • Cores: The AMD A6-9500 has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron J1800 has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD A6-9500 supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J1800.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD A6-9500 uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron J1800 uses the FCBGA1170.
  • Launch Date: The AMD A6-9500 was launched on Q4 2016, while the Intel Celeron J1800 was released on Q1 2014.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD A6-9500 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J1800.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD A6-9500 Intel Celeron J1800
AMD Intel
Manufacturer AMD Intel
Speed 3.5 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo 3.8 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores 2 2
Threads 2
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 FCBGA1170
Launched Q4 2016 Q1 2014
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD A6-9500:



27%
Intel Celeron J1800:
10%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD A6-9500



2%
Intel Celeron J1800:
0%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD A6-9500: 65 watts



16.25%
Intel Celeron J1800: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD A6-9500 : Q4 2016 ✅

Intel Celeron J1800 : Q1 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD A6-9500



Intel Celeron J1800


Pro's and Con's

AMD A6-9500 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD A6-9500 was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the Intel Celeron J1800 (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A6-9500 has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J1800's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A6-9500 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J1800's 2.6 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1625, the AMD A6-9500 outperforms the Intel Celeron J1800 (score: 658). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD A6-9500 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J1800's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A6-9500 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J1800's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron J1800 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J1800 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD A6-9500's 17.82. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J1800 scores 573, which is lower than the AMD A6-9500's score of 1870. This makes the AMD A6-9500 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


AMD A6-9500
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron J1800
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD A6-9500
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron J1800
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD A6-9500

The AMD A6-9500 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron J1800

The Intel Celeron J1800 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.