Comparison between AMD A8-7500 and Intel Celeron G1620T
AMD A8-7500 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel.
AMD A8-7500 has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G1620T's 2.4 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
AMD A8-7500 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G1620T's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G1620T supports more threads (2) compared to AMD A8-7500's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD A8-7500 uses the FM2+ socket, while Intel Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155 socket.
AMD A8-7500 was launched in Q2 2016, while Intel Celeron G1620T was launched in Q1 2014.
Intel Celeron G1620T has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD A8-7500's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD A8-7500 and Intel Celeron G1620T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD A8-7500 has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G1620T runs at 2.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD A8-7500 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
Cores: The AMD A8-7500 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G1620T has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD A8-7500 supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD A8-7500 uses the FM2+, while the Intel Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155.
Launch Date: The AMD A8-7500 was launched on Q2 2016, while the Intel Celeron G1620T was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD A8-7500 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G1620T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD A8-7500
Intel Celeron G1620T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.0 GHz
2.4 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
LGA1155
Launched
Q2 2016
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD A8-7500:
23%
Intel Celeron G1620T:
22%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD A8-7500
4%
Intel Celeron G1620T:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD A8-7500: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron G1620T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD A8-7500 : Q2 2016 ✅
Intel Celeron G1620T : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD A8-7500
Intel Celeron G1620T
Pro's and Con's
AMD A8-7500 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A8-7500 was launched more recently (Q2 2016) compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A8-7500 has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1410, the AMD A8-7500 outperforms the Intel Celeron G1620T (score: 1327). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A8-7500 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 36.48. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A8-7500 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G1620T's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A8-7500 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G1620T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G1620T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G1620T features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD A8-7500's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G1620T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A8-7500's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G1620T scores 1532, which is lower than the AMD A8-7500's score of 3422. This makes the AMD A8-7500 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD A8-7500
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G1620T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD A8-7500
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G1620T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD A8-7500
The AMD A8-7500 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G1620T
The Intel Celeron G1620T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
