Comparison between AMD A8-7690K and Intel Core i5-10500T
AMD A8-7690K is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i5-10500T is manufactured by Intel.
AMD A8-7690K has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-10500T's 2.3 GHz.
Intel Core i5-10500T has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD A8-7690K's GHz.
Intel Core i5-10500T has more cores (6) compared to AMD A8-7690K's 4 cores.
Intel Core i5-10500T supports more threads (12) compared to AMD A8-7690K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD A8-7690K uses the FM2+ socket, while Intel Core i5-10500T uses the FCLGA1200 socket.
AMD A8-7690K was launched in Q2 2023, while Intel Core i5-10500T was launched in Q2 2020.
Intel Core i5-10500T has a larger L3 cache of 12 MB compared to AMD A8-7690K's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD A8-7690K and Intel Core i5-10500T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD A8-7690K has a base speed of 3.7 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-10500T runs at 2.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD A8-7690K supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the Intel Core i5-10500T.
Cores: The AMD A8-7690K has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i5-10500T has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD A8-7690K supports threads, compared to 12 threads for the Intel Core i5-10500T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD A8-7690K uses the FM2+, while the Intel Core i5-10500T uses the FCLGA1200.
Launch Date: The AMD A8-7690K was launched on Q2 2023, while the Intel Core i5-10500T was released on Q2 2020.
L3 Cache: The AMD A8-7690K has MB of L3 cache, compared to 12 MB for the Intel Core i5-10500T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD A8-7690K
Intel Core i5-10500T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
4
6
Threads
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
FCLGA1200
Launched
Q2 2023
Q2 2020
L3 Cache
MB
12 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD A8-7690K:
24%
Intel Core i5-10500T:
38%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD A8-7690K
3%
Intel Core i5-10500T:
14%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD A8-7690K: 95 watts
23.75%
Intel Core i5-10500T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD A8-7690K : Q2 2023 ✅
Intel Core i5-10500T : Q2 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD A8-7690K
Intel Core i5-10500T
Pro's and Con's
AMD A8-7690K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A8-7690K was launched more recently (Q2 2023) compared to the Intel Core i5-10500T (Q2 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A8-7690K has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-10500T's 2.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A8-7690K has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i5-10500T's 101.47. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A8-7690K has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-10500T's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD A8-7690K has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-10500T's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A8-7690K scores 2157, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-10500T's score of 10146. This makes the Intel Core i5-10500T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A8-7690K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Core i5-10500T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i5-10500T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i5-10500T supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD A8-7690K's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2291, the Intel Core i5-10500T outperforms the AMD A8-7690K (score: 1441). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-10500T features a larger L3 cache of 12MB compared to the AMD A8-7690K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
Productivity
AMD A8-7690K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i5-10500T
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD A8-7690K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i5-10500T
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD A8-7690K
The AMD A8-7690K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i5-10500T
The Intel Core i5-10500T is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
