Comparison between AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD PRO A6-9500
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.5 GHz.
AMD PRO A6-9500 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
AMD Athlon 3000G supports more threads (4) compared to AMD PRO A6-9500's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: AM4.
AMD Athlon 3000G was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD PRO A6-9500 was launched in Q1 2017.
AMD Athlon 3000G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD PRO A6-9500's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD PRO A6-9500 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD PRO A6-9500 runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon 3000G supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD PRO A6-9500.
Cores: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores, while the AMD PRO A6-9500 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon 3000G supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD PRO A6-9500.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4, while the AMD PRO A6-9500 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD PRO A6-9500 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD PRO A6-9500.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon 3000G
AMD PRO A6-9500
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM4
Launched
Q4 2019
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 3000G:
32%
AMD PRO A6-9500:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon 3000G
6%
AMD PRO A6-9500:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon 3000G: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD PRO A6-9500: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon 3000G : Q4 2019 ✅
AMD PRO A6-9500 : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon 3000G
AMD PRO A6-9500
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon 3000G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD PRO A6-9500 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1979, the AMD Athlon 3000G outperforms the AMD PRO A6-9500 (score: 1520). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 3000G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD PRO A6-9500's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher CPU Mark score of 49.74 compared to the AMD PRO A6-9500's 24.11. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
AMD PRO A6-9500 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A6-9500 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A6-9500 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A6-9500 scores 1784, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 3000G's score of 4477. This makes the AMD Athlon 3000G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A6-9500 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon 3000G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD PRO A6-9500
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon 3000G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD PRO A6-9500
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon 3000G
The AMD Athlon 3000G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD PRO A6-9500
The AMD PRO A6-9500 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
