🚀 CPU Launch

AMD Athlon II X4 557 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon II X4 557 and AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.2 GHz. AMD Ryzen 7 2700 has a higher turbo speed of 4.1 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 557's 3.7 GHz. AMD Ryzen 7 2700 has more cores (8) compared to AMD Athlon II X4 557's 4 cores. AMD Ryzen 7 2700 supports more threads (16) compared to AMD Athlon II X4 557's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon II X4 557 uses the AM3 socket, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 uses the AM4 socket. AMD Athlon II X4 557 was launched in Q3 2021, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 was launched in Q2 2018. AMD Ryzen 7 2700 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Athlon II X4 557's 6 MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon II X4 557 and AMD Ryzen 7 2700 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 runs at 3.2 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 supports a turbo speed of 3.7 GHz, compared to 4.1 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 has 8 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 supports 4 threads, compared to 16 threads for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 uses the AM3, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 uses the AM4.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 was launched on Q3 2021, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 was released on Q2 2018.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has 6 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon II X4 557 AMD Ryzen 7 2700
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.2 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo 3.7 GHz 4.1 GHz
Cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM3 AM4
Launched Q3 2021 Q2 2018
L3 Cache 6 MB 16 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon II X4 557:



22%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700:
36%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon II X4 557



3%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700:
22%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon II X4 557: 160 watts



40%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon II X4 557 : Q3 2021 ✅

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 : Q2 2018 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon II X4 557



AMD Ryzen 7 2700


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon II X4 557 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (Q2 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700's 201.20. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 2700's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 2700's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 557 scores 2567, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 2700's score of 15694. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a higher TDP of 160W compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 557's 3.7 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2178, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 557 (score: 1345). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 557's 6MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Not available


Productivity


AMD Athlon II X4 557
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon II X4 557
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon II X4 557

The AMD Athlon II X4 557 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.