Comparison between AMD Athlon II X4 557 and Intel Core i3-3250T
AMD Athlon II X4 557 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-3250T is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 3.0 GHz.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a higher turbo speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's GHz.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 uses the AM3 socket, while Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155 socket.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 was launched in Q3 2021, while Intel Core i3-3250T was launched in Q1 2016.
AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 3 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon II X4 557 and Intel Core i3-3250T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-3250T runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 supports a turbo speed of 3.7 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Cores: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 uses the AM3, while the Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 was launched on Q3 2021, while the Intel Core i3-3250T was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has 6 MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon II X4 557
Intel Core i3-3250T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.2 GHz
3.0 GHz
Turbo
3.7 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM3
FCLGA1155
Launched
Q3 2021
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
6 MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon II X4 557:
22%
Intel Core i3-3250T:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon II X4 557
3%
Intel Core i3-3250T:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon II X4 557: 160 watts
40%
Intel Core i3-3250T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon II X4 557 : Q3 2021 ✅
Intel Core i3-3250T : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon II X4 557
Intel Core i3-3250T
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon II X4 557 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 3MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 557 scores 2567, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-3250T's score of 2650. This makes the Intel Core i3-3250T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 557 has a higher TDP of 160W compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i3-3250T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1684, the Intel Core i3-3250T outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 557 (score: 1345). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 557's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Productivity
AMD Athlon II X4 557
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-3250T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon II X4 557
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-3250T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon II X4 557
The AMD Athlon II X4 557 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-3250T
The Intel Core i3-3250T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
