🚀 CPU Launch

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core vs AMD A6-6400B APU

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core and AMD A6-6400B APU

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD A6-6400B APU has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz. AMD A6-6400B APU has a higher turbo speed of 4.1 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's GHz. AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has more cores (4) compared to AMD A6-6400B APU's 2 cores. AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A6-6400B APU's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1 socket, while AMD A6-6400B APU uses the FM2 socket. AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2015, while AMD A6-6400B APU was launched in Q1 2014. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core and AMD A6-6400B APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has a base speed of 2.7 GHz, while the AMD A6-6400B APU runs at 3.9 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.1 GHz for the AMD A6-6400B APU.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has 4 cores, while the AMD A6-6400B APU has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A6-6400B APU.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1, while the AMD A6-6400B APU uses the FM2.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched on Q2 2015, while the AMD A6-6400B APU was released on Q1 2014.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A6-6400B APU.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core AMD A6-6400B APU
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 2.7 GHz 3.9 GHz
Turbo GHz 4.1 GHz
Cores 4 2
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FM1 FM2
Launched Q2 2015 Q1 2014
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:



19%
AMD A6-6400B APU:
26%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core



3%
AMD A6-6400B APU:
2%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD A6-6400B APU: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core : Q2 2015 ✅

AMD A6-6400B APU : Q1 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core



AMD A6-6400B APU


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched more recently (Q2 2015) compared to the AMD A6-6400B APU (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD A6-6400B APU – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A6-6400B APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A6-6400B APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1608, the AMD A6-6400B APU outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core (score: 1163). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A6-6400B APU has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 35.79. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD A6-6400B APU has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The AMD A6-6400B APU has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A6-6400B APU scores 1616, which is lower than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's score of 2250. This makes the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD A6-6400B APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD A6-6400B APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core

The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD A6-6400B APU

The AMD A6-6400B APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.