Comparison between AMD Athlon X2 450 and AMD Athlon X4 860K
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon X4 860K has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X2 450's 3.5 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 860K has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X2 450's 3.9 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 860K has more cores (4) compared to AMD Athlon X2 450's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: FM2+.
AMD Athlon X2 450 was launched in Q3 2022, while AMD Athlon X4 860K was launched in Q3 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X2 450 and AMD Athlon X4 860K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X2 450 supports a turbo speed of 3.9 GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X2 450 supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X2 450 uses the FM2+, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X2 450 was launched on Q3 2022, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K was released on Q3 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X2 450
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
3.9 GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
FM2+
Launched
Q3 2022
Q3 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X2 450:
14%
AMD Athlon X4 860K:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X2 450
1%
AMD Athlon X4 860K:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X2 450: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon X4 860K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X2 450 : Q3 2022 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 860K : Q3 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X2 450
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X2 450 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X2 450 was launched more recently (Q3 2022) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K (Q3 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K's 247.57. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X2 450 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 860K's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X2 450 scores 1295, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 860K's score of 3431. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 860K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Athlon X4 860K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 860K has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X2 450's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 860K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X2 450's 3.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1528, the AMD Athlon X4 860K outperforms the AMD Athlon X2 450 (score: 878). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 860K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Athlon X2 450's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Athlon X2 450
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 860K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X2 450
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X2 450
The AMD Athlon X2 450 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 860K
The AMD Athlon X4 860K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.