🚀 CPU Launch

AMD Athlon X4 830 vs AMD FirePro A320 APU

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 830 and AMD FirePro A320 APU

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's 3.0 GHz. AMD Athlon X4 830 has a higher turbo speed of 34.0 GHz compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's 4.2 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+ socket, while AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2 socket. AMD Athlon X4 830 was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched in Q3 2016. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Athlon X4 830 and AMD FirePro A320 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU runs at 3.8 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports a turbo speed of 34.0 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
  • Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has 4 cores, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 830 was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU was released on Q3 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Athlon X4 830 AMD FirePro A320 APU
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.0 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo 34.0 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FM2+ FM2
Launched Q1 2018 Q3 2016
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Athlon X4 830:



21%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
19%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Athlon X4 830



4%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
3%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Athlon X4 830: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD FirePro A320 APU: 100 watts
25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Athlon X4 830 : Q1 2018 ✅

AMD FirePro A320 APU : Q3 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Athlon X4 830



AMD FirePro A320 APU


Pro's and Con's

AMD Athlon X4 830 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 34.0 GHz compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's 4.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1292, the AMD Athlon X4 830 outperforms the AMD FirePro A320 APU (score: 1193). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD FirePro A320 APU – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's 14.34. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FirePro A320 APU scores 2153, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 830's score of 2901. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 830 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher TDP of 100W compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD Athlon X4 830
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD FirePro A320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Athlon X4 830
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD FirePro A320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Athlon X4 830

The AMD Athlon X4 830 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD FirePro A320 APU

The AMD FirePro A320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.