Comparison between AMD Athlon X4 950 and Intel Celeron J3160
AMD Athlon X4 950 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Athlon X4 950 has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3160's 1.6 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 950 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3160's 2.2 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Intel Celeron J3160 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD Athlon X4 950's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Athlon X4 950 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron J3160 uses the BGA1170 socket.
AMD Athlon X4 950 was launched in Q3 2017, while Intel Celeron J3160 was launched in Q2 2016.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Athlon X4 950 and Intel Celeron J3160 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 950 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J3160 runs at 1.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Athlon X4 950 supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to 2.2 GHz for the Intel Celeron J3160.
Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 950 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron J3160 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 950 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron J3160.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Athlon X4 950 uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron J3160 uses the BGA1170.
Launch Date: The AMD Athlon X4 950 was launched on Q3 2017, while the Intel Celeron J3160 was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon X4 950 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J3160.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Athlon X4 950
Intel Celeron J3160
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
BGA1170
Launched
Q3 2017
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 950:
27%
Intel Celeron J3160:
10%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Athlon X4 950
5%
Intel Celeron J3160:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Athlon X4 950: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron J3160: 6 watts
1.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Athlon X4 950 : Q3 2017 ✅
Intel Celeron J3160 : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Athlon X4 950
Intel Celeron J3160
Pro's and Con's
AMD Athlon X4 950 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 950 was launched more recently (Q3 2017) compared to the Intel Celeron J3160 (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 950 has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 1.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 950 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 2.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1636, the AMD Athlon X4 950 outperforms the Intel Celeron J3160 (score: 605). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 950 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J3160's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 950 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J3160 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J3160 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 950's 122.72. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3160 scores 1271, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 950's score of 3591. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 950 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Athlon X4 950
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J3160
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Athlon X4 950
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J3160
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Athlon X4 950
The AMD Athlon X4 950 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J3160
The Intel Celeron J3160 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
