🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-FX-4320-vs-Intel-Core-i3-4360T

AMD FX-4320 vs Intel Core i3-4360T

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD FX-4320 and Intel Core i3-4360T

AMD FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4360T's 3.2 GHz. AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4360T's GHz. AMD FX-4320 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-4360T's 2 cores. Intel Core i3-4360T supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket, while Intel Core i3-4360T uses the LGA1150 socket. AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016, while Intel Core i3-4360T was launched in Q3 2014. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD FX-4320 and Intel Core i3-4360T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a base speed of 4.0 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-4360T runs at 3.2 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD FX-4320 supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-4360T.
  • Cores: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-4360T has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD FX-4320 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-4360T.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+, while the Intel Core i3-4360T uses the LGA1150.
  • Launch Date: The AMD FX-4320 was launched on Q1 2016, while the Intel Core i3-4360T was released on Q3 2014.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Core i3-4360T.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD FX-4320 Intel Core i3-4360T
AMD Intel
Manufacturer AMD Intel
Speed 4.0 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo 4.2 GHz GHz
Cores 4 2
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM3+ LGA1150
Launched Q1 2016 Q3 2014
L3 Cache 4 MB 4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD FX-4320:



26%
Intel Core i3-4360T:
31%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD FX-4320



4%
Intel Core i3-4360T:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD FX-4320: 95 watts



23.75%
Intel Core i3-4360T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅

Intel Core i3-4360T : Q3 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD FX-4320



Intel Core i3-4360T


Pro's and Con's

AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4360T's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4360T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-4360T's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-4360T's score of 3286. This makes the Intel Core i3-4360T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Core i3-4360T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Core i3-4360T – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-4360T was launched more recently (Q3 2014) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1873, the Intel Core i3-4360T outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-4360T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-4320's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.


Productivity


AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Core i3-4360T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Core i3-4360T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD FX-4320

The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Core i3-4360T

The Intel Core i3-4360T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.