Comparison between AMD FX-4320 and Intel Core i5-6600
AMD FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i5-6600 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-6600's 3.3 GHz.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-6600's 3.9 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Intel Core i5-6600 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket, while Intel Core i5-6600 uses the LGA socket.
AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016, while Intel Core i5-6600 was launched in Q3 2015.
Intel Core i5-6600 has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to AMD FX-4320's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD FX-4320 and Intel Core i5-6600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a base speed of 4.0 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-6600 runs at 3.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD FX-4320 supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the Intel Core i5-6600.
Cores: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i5-6600 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD FX-4320 supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i5-6600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+, while the Intel Core i5-6600 uses the LGA.
Launch Date: The AMD FX-4320 was launched on Q1 2016, while the Intel Core i5-6600 was released on Q3 2015.
L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 6 MB for the Intel Core i5-6600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD FX-4320
Intel Core i5-6600
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
4.0 GHz
3.3 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM3+
LGA
Launched
Q1 2016
Q3 2015
L3 Cache
4 MB
6 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD FX-4320:
26%
Intel Core i5-6600:
37%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD FX-4320
4%
Intel Core i5-6600:
8%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
Intel Core i5-6600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅
Intel Core i5-6600 : Q3 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD FX-4320
Intel Core i5-6600
Pro's and Con's
AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-6600's 3.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-6600's 3.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i5-6600's 123.17. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-6600's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-6600's score of 6058. This makes the Intel Core i5-6600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Core i5-6600's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i5-6600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i5-6600 was launched more recently (Q3 2015) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2259, the Intel Core i5-6600 outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-6600 features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the AMD FX-4320's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
Productivity
AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i5-6600
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i5-6600
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD FX-4320
The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i5-6600
The Intel Core i5-6600 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
