Comparison between AMD FirePro A320 APU and Intel Celeron 1047UE
AMD FirePro A320 APU is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's 1.4 GHz.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's GHz.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron 1047UE supports more threads (2) compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2 socket, while Intel Celeron 1047UE uses the FCBGA1023 socket.
AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched in Q3 2016, while Intel Celeron 1047UE was launched in Q1 2014.
Intel Celeron 1047UE has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD FirePro A320 APU and Intel Celeron 1047UE are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE runs at 1.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.
Cores: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE uses the FCBGA1023.
Launch Date: The AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched on Q3 2016, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Intel Celeron 1047UE
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.8 GHz
1.4 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2
FCBGA1023
Launched
Q3 2016
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
19%
Intel Celeron 1047UE:
8%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD FirePro A320 APU
3%
Intel Celeron 1047UE:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD FirePro A320 APU: 100 watts
25%
Intel Celeron 1047UE: 17 watts
4.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD FirePro A320 APU : Q3 2016 ✅
Intel Celeron 1047UE : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Intel Celeron 1047UE
Pro's and Con's
AMD FirePro A320 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE's 1.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1193, the AMD FirePro A320 APU outperforms the Intel Celeron 1047UE (score: 526). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron 1047UE's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher TDP of 100W compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE's 17W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron 1047UE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron 1047UE features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron 1047UE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FirePro A320 APU's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron 1047UE scores 748, which is lower than the AMD FirePro A320 APU's score of 2153. This makes the AMD FirePro A320 APU a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD FirePro A320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron 1047UE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron 1047UE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD FirePro A320 APU
The AMD FirePro A320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron 1047UE
The Intel Celeron 1047UE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
