🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-FirePro-A320-APU-vs-Intel-Celeron-J3160

AMD FirePro A320 APU vs Intel Celeron J3160

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD FirePro A320 APU and Intel Celeron J3160

AMD FirePro A320 APU is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel. AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3160's 1.6 GHz. AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3160's 2.2 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). Intel Celeron J3160 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2 socket, while Intel Celeron J3160 uses the BGA1170 socket. AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched in Q3 2016, while Intel Celeron J3160 was launched in Q2 2016. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD FirePro A320 APU and Intel Celeron J3160 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J3160 runs at 1.6 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 2.2 GHz for the Intel Celeron J3160.
  • Cores: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron J3160 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron J3160.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2, while the Intel Celeron J3160 uses the BGA1170.
  • Launch Date: The AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched on Q3 2016, while the Intel Celeron J3160 was released on Q2 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J3160.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD FirePro A320 APU Intel Celeron J3160
AMD Intel
Manufacturer AMD Intel
Speed 3.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo 4.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FM2 BGA1170
Launched Q3 2016 Q2 2016
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD FirePro A320 APU:



19%
Intel Celeron J3160:
10%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD FirePro A320 APU



3%
Intel Celeron J3160:
1%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD FirePro A320 APU: 100 watts



25%
Intel Celeron J3160: 6 watts
1.5%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD FirePro A320 APU : Q3 2016 ✅

Intel Celeron J3160 : Q2 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD FirePro A320 APU



Intel Celeron J3160


Pro's and Con's

AMD FirePro A320 APU – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the Intel Celeron J3160 (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 1.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 2.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1193, the AMD FirePro A320 APU outperforms the Intel Celeron J3160 (score: 605). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J3160's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher TDP of 100W compared to the Intel Celeron J3160's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron J3160 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Not available

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3160 scores 1271, which is lower than the AMD FirePro A320 APU's score of 2153. This makes the AMD FirePro A320 APU a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


AMD FirePro A320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron J3160
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD FirePro A320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron J3160
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD FirePro A320 APU

The AMD FirePro A320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron J3160

The Intel Celeron J3160 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.