Comparison between AMD PRO A10-8770E and AMD Sempron 2650 APU
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher base speed of 2.8 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 2650 APU's 1.5 GHz.
AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher turbo speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 2650 APU's GHz.
AMD PRO A10-8770E has more cores (4) compared to AMD Sempron 2650 APU's 2 cores.
AMD Sempron 2650 APU supports more threads (2) compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Sempron 2650 APU uses the AM1,FSB1 socket.
AMD PRO A10-8770E was launched in Q1 2017, while AMD Sempron 2650 APU was launched in Q2 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A10-8770E and AMD Sempron 2650 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the AMD Sempron 2650 APU runs at 1.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports a turbo speed of 3.5 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Sempron 2650 APU.
Cores: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores, while the AMD Sempron 2650 APU has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the AMD Sempron 2650 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4, while the AMD Sempron 2650 APU uses the AM1,FSB1.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A10-8770E was launched on Q1 2017, while the AMD Sempron 2650 APU was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Sempron 2650 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A10-8770E
AMD Sempron 2650 APU
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
2.8 GHz
1.5 GHz
Turbo
3.5 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM1,FSB1
Launched
Q1 2017
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A10-8770E:
24%
AMD Sempron 2650 APU:
7%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A10-8770E
4%
AMD Sempron 2650 APU:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A10-8770E: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD Sempron 2650 APU: 25 watts
6.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A10-8770E : Q1 2017 ✅
AMD Sempron 2650 APU : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A10-8770E
AMD Sempron 2650 APU
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A10-8770E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher base clock speed of 2.8 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 2650 APU's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 2650 APU's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1450, the AMD PRO A10-8770E outperforms the AMD Sempron 2650 APU (score: 477). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Sempron 2650 APU's 5.59. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Sempron 2650 APU's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the AMD Sempron 2650 APU's 25W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Sempron 2650 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Sempron 2650 APU was launched more recently (Q2 2014) compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Sempron 2650 APU has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron 2650 APU scores 551, which is lower than the AMD PRO A10-8770E's score of 3037. This makes the AMD PRO A10-8770E a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD PRO A10-8770E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Sempron 2650 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Sempron 2650 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A10-8770E
The AMD PRO A10-8770E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Sempron 2650 APU
The AMD Sempron 2650 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
