Comparison between AMD PRO A12-9800 and Intel Celeron G3920
AMD PRO A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3920's 2.9 GHz.
AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3920's GHz.
AMD PRO A12-9800 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3920's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G3920 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD PRO A12-9800's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron G3920 uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
AMD PRO A12-9800 was launched in Q1 2017, while Intel Celeron G3920 was launched in Q2 2016.
Intel Celeron G3920 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD PRO A12-9800's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD PRO A12-9800 and Intel Celeron G3920 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3920 runs at 2.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD PRO A12-9800 supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3920.
Cores: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3920 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD PRO A12-9800 supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3920.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron G3920 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The AMD PRO A12-9800 was launched on Q1 2017, while the Intel Celeron G3920 was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3920.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD PRO A12-9800
Intel Celeron G3920
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q1 2017
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-9800:
28%
Intel Celeron G3920:
29%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD PRO A12-9800
5%
Intel Celeron G3920:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD PRO A12-9800: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron G3920: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD PRO A12-9800 : Q1 2017 ✅
Intel Celeron G3920 : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD PRO A12-9800
Intel Celeron G3920
Pro's and Con's
AMD PRO A12-9800 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher CPU Mark score of 21.92 compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 2.18. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G3920's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G3920 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G3920 was launched more recently (Q2 2016) compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1781, the Intel Celeron G3920 outperforms the AMD PRO A12-9800 (score: 1686). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3920 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3920 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD PRO A12-9800's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3920 scores 2358, which is lower than the AMD PRO A12-9800's score of 3705. This makes the AMD PRO A12-9800 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD PRO A12-9800
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3920
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD PRO A12-9800
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3920
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD PRO A12-9800
The AMD PRO A12-9800 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3920
The Intel Celeron G3920 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
