Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 3200G and Intel Core i7-6900K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i7-6900K is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Core i7-6900K's 3.2 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of 4.0 GHz.
Intel Core i7-6900K has more cores (8) compared to AMD Ryzen 3 3200G's 4 cores.
Intel Core i7-6900K supports more threads (16) compared to AMD Ryzen 3 3200G's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i7-6900K uses the FCLGA2011-3 socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G was launched in Q3 2019, while Intel Core i7-6900K was launched in Q2 2016.
Intel Core i7-6900K has a larger L3 cache of 20 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 3 3200G's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G and Intel Core i7-6900K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-6900K runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the Intel Core i7-6900K.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i7-6900K has 8 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G supports 4 threads, compared to 16 threads for the Intel Core i7-6900K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i7-6900K uses the FCLGA2011-3.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G was launched on Q3 2019, while the Intel Core i7-6900K was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 20 MB for the Intel Core i7-6900K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i7-6900K
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
4.0 GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
4
8
Threads
4
16
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA2011-3
Launched
Q3 2019
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
4 MB
20 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G:
36%
Intel Core i7-6900K:
38%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
10%
Intel Core i7-6900K:
20%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i7-6900K: 140 watts
35%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G : Q3 2019 ✅
Intel Core i7-6900K : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i7-6900K
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G was launched more recently (Q3 2019) compared to the Intel Core i7-6900K (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Core i7-6900K's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i7-6900K's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G has 4 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i7-6900K's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G scores 7124, which is lower than the Intel Core i7-6900K's score of 14470. This makes the Intel Core i7-6900K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Intel Core i7-6900K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2328, the Intel Core i7-6900K outperforms the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G (score: 2205). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i7-6900K features a larger L3 cache of 20MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i7-6900K has a higher CPU Mark score of 118.61 compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G's 100.91. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i7-6900K has a higher TDP of 140W compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i7-6900K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i7-6900K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i7-6900K
The Intel Core i7-6900K is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
