🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Ryzen-3-4100-vs-AMD-FX-4320

AMD Ryzen 3 4100 vs AMD FX-4320

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 4100 and AMD FX-4320

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 3 4100's 3.8 GHz. AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 3 4100's 4.0 GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4). AMD Ryzen 3 4100 supports more threads (8) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Ryzen 3 4100 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket. AMD Ryzen 3 4100 was launched in Q2 2022, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Ryzen 3 4100 and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 4100 has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 4100 supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
  • Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 4100 has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 4100 supports 8 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 4100 uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 4100 was launched on Q2 2022, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 4100 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Ryzen 3 4100 AMD FX-4320
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.8 GHz 4.0 GHz
Turbo 4.0 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 4 4
Threads 8
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 AM3+
Launched Q2 2022 Q1 2016
L3 Cache 4 MB 4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 3 4100:



42%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 3 4100



15%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Ryzen 3 4100: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Ryzen 3 4100 : Q2 2022 ✅

AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Ryzen 3 4100



AMD FX-4320


Pro's and Con's

AMD Ryzen 3 4100 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 4100 was launched more recently (Q2 2022) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2522, the AMD Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 4100's 3.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 4100's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 4100's 165.66. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 4100's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 4100's score of 11025. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 4100 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 4100's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


AMD Ryzen 3 4100
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Ryzen 3 4100
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Ryzen 3 4100

The AMD Ryzen 3 4100 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD FX-4320

The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.