Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and AMD FirePro A320 APU
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's 3.1 GHz.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's 3.4 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2 socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 was launched in Q3 2017, while AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched in Q3 2016.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and AMD FirePro A320 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has a base speed of 3.1 GHz, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 supports a turbo speed of 3.4 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has 4 cores, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 uses the AM4, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 was launched on Q3 2017, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU was released on Q3 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM2
Launched
Q3 2017
Q3 2016
L3 Cache
8 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200:
31%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
8%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD FirePro A320 APU: 100 watts
25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 : Q3 2017 ✅
AMD FirePro A320 APU : Q3 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 was launched more recently (Q3 2017) compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU (Q3 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1913, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 outperforms the AMD FirePro A320 APU (score: 1193). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD FirePro A320 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's 3.4 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FirePro A320 APU scores 2153, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's score of 6143. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher TDP of 100W compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
The AMD FirePro A320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
