AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Table of Contents
Overview:
Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a higher turbo speed of 3.7 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1 socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2015.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core runs at 2.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G supports a turbo speed of 3.7 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G uses the AM4, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was released on Q2 2015.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Turbo
3.7 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM1
Launched
Q1 2018
Q2 2015
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G:
34%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
9%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G : Q1 2018 ✅
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core : Q2 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2053, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core (score: 1163). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 35.79. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched more recently (Q2 2015) compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core scores 2250, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G's score of 6745. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
