Comparison between AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and AMD Athlon X4 830
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's 3.0 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 830 has a higher turbo speed of 34.0 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4.0 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports more threads (4) compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+ socket.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD Athlon X4 830 was launched in Q1 2018.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and AMD Athlon X4 830 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 830 runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 34.0 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 830.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 830 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 830.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4, while the AMD Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD Athlon X4 830 was released on Q1 2018.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 830.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD Athlon X4 830
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.6 GHz
3.0 GHz
Turbo
4.0 GHz
34.0 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM2+
Launched
Q4 2019
Q1 2018
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G:
36%
AMD Athlon X4 830:
21%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
10%
AMD Athlon X4 830:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon X4 830: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G : Q4 2019 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 830 : Q1 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD Athlon X4 830
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2191, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 830 (score: 1292). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's 14.34. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Athlon X4 830 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 34.0 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 830 scores 2901, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's score of 6989. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 830
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 830
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 830
The AMD Athlon X4 830 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
