🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » AMD-Ryzen-5-3500-vs-AMD-A10-7860K

AMD Ryzen 5 3500 vs AMD A10-7860K

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 3500 and AMD A10-7860K

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.6 GHz. AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a higher turbo speed of 4.1 GHz compared to AMD A10-7860K's 4.0 GHz. AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has more cores (6) compared to AMD A10-7860K's 4 cores. AMD Ryzen 5 3500 supports more threads (6) compared to AMD A10-7860K's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Ryzen 5 3500 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD A10-7860K uses the FM2+ socket. AMD Ryzen 5 3500 was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD A10-7860K was launched in Q1 2016. AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD A10-7860K's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 and AMD A10-7860K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD A10-7860K runs at 3.6 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 supports a turbo speed of 4.1 GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD A10-7860K.
  • Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has 6 cores, while the AMD A10-7860K has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 supports 6 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-7860K.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 uses the AM4, while the AMD A10-7860K uses the FM2+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD A10-7860K was released on Q1 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-7860K.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Ryzen 5 3500 AMD A10-7860K
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo 4.1 GHz 4.0 GHz
Cores 6 4
Threads 6
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 FM2+
Launched Q4 2019 Q1 2016
L3 Cache 16 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 5 3500:



41%
AMD A10-7860K:
24%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 5 3500



18%
AMD A10-7860K:
4%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Ryzen 5 3500: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD A10-7860K: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Ryzen 5 3500 : Q4 2019 ✅

AMD A10-7860K : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Ryzen 5 3500



AMD A10-7860K


Pro's and Con's

AMD Ryzen 5 3500 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD A10-7860K (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the AMD A10-7860K's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2501, the AMD Ryzen 5 3500 outperforms the AMD A10-7860K (score: 1488). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD A10-7860K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 has a higher CPU Mark score of 148.71 compared to the AMD A10-7860K's 62.12. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD A10-7860K – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Not available

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD A10-7860K has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3500's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-7860K has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3500's 6 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A10-7860K scores 3284, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 3500's score of 12788. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 3500 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


AMD Ryzen 5 3500
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD A10-7860K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

AMD A10-7860K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 3500

The AMD Ryzen 5 3500 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD A10-7860K

The AMD A10-7860K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.