Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a higher base speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 3.6 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a higher turbo speed of 4.7 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4.0 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has more cores (6) compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports more threads (12) compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AM5 socket, while AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F was launched in Q2 2024, while AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched in Q4 2019.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a base speed of 4.2 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports a turbo speed of 4.7 GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has 6 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports 12 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AM5, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F was launched on Q2 2024, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was released on Q4 2019.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
4.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
4.7 GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
6
4
Threads
12
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
AM4
Launched
Q2 2024
Q4 2019
L3 Cache
16 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F:
61%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G:
36%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
35%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G:
10%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F : Q2 2024 ✅
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G : Q4 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a higher base clock speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 3.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.7 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3665, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G (score: 2191). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (Q2 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 151.81. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G scores 6989, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's score of 24371. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
