Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a higher base speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT's 3.9 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of 4.7 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT has more cores (8) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 6 cores.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT supports more threads (16) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 12 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AM5 socket, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F was launched in Q2 2024, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT was launched in Q3 2020.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 16 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a base speed of 4.2 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT runs at 3.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports a turbo speed of 4.7 GHz, compared to 4.7 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has 6 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT has 8 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports 12 threads, compared to 16 threads for the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AM5, while the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F was launched on Q2 2024, while the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT was released on Q3 2020.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to 32 MB for the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Turbo
4.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Cores
6
8
Threads
12
16
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
AM4
Launched
Q2 2024
Q3 2020
L3 Cache
16 MB
32 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F:
61%
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT:
46%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
35%
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT:
34%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT: 105 watts
26.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F : Q2 2024 ✅
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT : Q3 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a higher base clock speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT's 3.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3665, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT (score: 2803). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a higher CPU Mark score of 151.81 compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT's 39.82. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has 6 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has 12 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (Q2 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 16MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT scores 23605, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's score of 24371. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT has a higher TDP of 105W compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
The AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
