Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and Intel Celeron J3060
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a higher base speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 1.6 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a higher turbo speed of 4.7 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2.5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has more cores (6) compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AM5 socket, while Intel Celeron J3060 uses the BGA1170 socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F was launched in Q2 2024, while Intel Celeron J3060 was launched in Q3 2016.
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Celeron J3060's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and Intel Celeron J3060 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a base speed of 4.2 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J3060 runs at 1.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports a turbo speed of 4.7 GHz, compared to 2.5 GHz for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has 6 cores, while the Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports 12 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AM5, while the Intel Celeron J3060 uses the BGA1170.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F was launched on Q2 2024, while the Intel Celeron J3060 was released on Q3 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Intel Celeron J3060
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
4.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Turbo
4.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Cores
6
2
Threads
12
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
BGA1170
Launched
Q2 2024
Q3 2016
L3 Cache
16 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F:
61%
Intel Celeron J3060:
10%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
35%
Intel Celeron J3060:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron J3060: 6 watts
1.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F : Q2 2024 ✅
Intel Celeron J3060 : Q3 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Intel Celeron J3060
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a higher base clock speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 1.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.7 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 2.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3665, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms the Intel Celeron J3060 (score: 635). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J3060 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J3060 was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (Q2 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J3060 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 151.81. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3060 scores 678, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F's score of 24371. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J3060
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J3060
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J3060
The Intel Celeron J3060 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.