🚀 CPU Launch

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 vs AMD Athlon X4 845

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 and AMD Athlon X4 845

Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 845's 3.5 GHz. AMD Athlon X4 845 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's GHz. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has more cores (6) compared to AMD Athlon X4 845's 4 cores. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports more threads (12) compared to AMD Athlon X4 845's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 uses the AM4 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 845 uses the FM2+ socket. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched in Q3 2019, while AMD Athlon X4 845 was launched in Q1 2016. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 845's MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 and AMD Athlon X4 845 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
  • Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 845 runs at 3.5 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 845.
  • Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has 6 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 845 has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports 12 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 845.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 uses the AM4, while the AMD Athlon X4 845 uses the FM2+.
  • Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched on Q3 2019, while the AMD Athlon X4 845 was released on Q1 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 845.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 AMD Athlon X4 845
AMD AMD
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Speed 3.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores 6 4
Threads 12
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket AM4 FM2+
Launched Q3 2019 Q1 2016
L3 Cache 32 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600:



41%
AMD Athlon X4 845:
27%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600



25%
AMD Athlon X4 845:
5%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD Athlon X4 845: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 : Q3 2019 ✅

AMD Athlon X4 845 : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600



AMD Athlon X4 845


Pro's and Con's

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched more recently (Q3 2019) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 845 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 845's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2495, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 845 (score: 1677). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 845's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 845's 107.12. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD Athlon X4 845 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 845 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 845 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 845 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 845 scores 3797, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's score of 17402. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Athlon X4 845
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

AMD Athlon X4 845
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Athlon X4 845

The AMD Athlon X4 845 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.