Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 and Intel Celeron 1047UE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's 1.4 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has more cores (6) compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron 1047UE uses the FCBGA1023 socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched in Q3 2019, while Intel Celeron 1047UE was launched in Q1 2014.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to Intel Celeron 1047UE's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 and Intel Celeron 1047UE are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE runs at 1.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has 6 cores, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports 12 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE uses the FCBGA1023.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched on Q3 2019, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Intel Celeron 1047UE
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.6 GHz
1.4 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
6
2
Threads
12
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1023
Launched
Q3 2019
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
32 MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600:
41%
Intel Celeron 1047UE:
8%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
25%
Intel Celeron 1047UE:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron 1047UE: 17 watts
4.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 : Q3 2019 ✅
Intel Celeron 1047UE : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Intel Celeron 1047UE
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched more recently (Q3 2019) compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE's 1.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2495, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 outperforms the Intel Celeron 1047UE (score: 526). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE's 17W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron 1047UE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron 1047UE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron 1047UE has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron 1047UE scores 748, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's score of 17402. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron 1047UE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Celeron 1047UE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron 1047UE
The Intel Celeron 1047UE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
