Comparison between AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE and AMD FirePro A320 APU
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's 3.8 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE has a higher turbo speed of 5.0 GHz compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's 4.2 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE has more cores (6) compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE supports more threads (12) compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE uses the AM5 socket, while AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2 socket.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE was launched in Q2 2024, while AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched in Q3 2016.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE and AMD FirePro A320 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE supports a turbo speed of 5.0 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE has 6 cores, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE supports 12 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE uses the AM5, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE was launched on Q2 2024, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU was released on Q3 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
5.0 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
6
4
Threads
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
FM2
Launched
Q2 2024
Q3 2016
L3 Cache
16 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE:
64%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE
35%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD FirePro A320 APU: 100 watts
25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE : Q2 2024 ✅
AMD FirePro A320 APU : Q3 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's 3.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.0 GHz compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's 4.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3885, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE outperforms the AMD FirePro A320 APU (score: 1193). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD FirePro A320 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE (Q2 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FirePro A320 APU scores 2153, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE's score of 24174. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher TDP of 100W compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8600GE is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
The AMD FirePro A320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
