Comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 3.2 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has a higher turbo speed of 4.5 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 3.6 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has more cores (8) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 6 cores.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X supports more threads (16) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 12 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: AM4.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X was launched in Q3 2019, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was launched in Q3 2017.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 16 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X supports a turbo speed of 4.5 GHz, compared to 3.6 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has 8 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X supports 16 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X uses the AM4, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X was launched on Q3 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was released on Q3 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Cores
8
6
Threads
16
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM4
Launched
Q3 2019
Q3 2017
L3 Cache
32 MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X:
45%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600:
31%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
33%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600:
16%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X: 105 watts
26.25%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X : Q3 2019 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 : Q3 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X was launched more recently (Q3 2019) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 (Q3 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.5 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 3.6 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2717, the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 (score: 1884). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 16MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has a higher TDP of 105W compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X's 115.62. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 12 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 scores 11240, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X's score of 23122. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.