Comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a higher base speed of 4.1 GHz compared to AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 3.2 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a higher turbo speed of 5.0 GHz compared to AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has more cores (8) compared to AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports more threads (16) compared to AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket, while AMD Athlon PRO 200GE uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F was launched in Q2 2024, while AMD Athlon PRO 200GE was launched in Q2 2018.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and AMD Athlon PRO 200GE are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a base speed of 4.1 GHz, while the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports a turbo speed of 5.0 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores, while the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports 16 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5, while the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F was launched on Q2 2024, while the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE was released on Q2 2018.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
4.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
5.0 GHz
GHz
Cores
8
2
Threads
16
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
AM4
Launched
Q2 2024
Q2 2018
L3 Cache
16 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F:
64%
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
45%
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F : Q2 2024 ✅
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE : Q2 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F was launched more recently (Q2 2024) compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE (Q2 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a higher base clock speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 3.2 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.0 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3882, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE (score: 1736). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 145.11. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon PRO 200GE scores 3693, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's score of 31198. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
The AMD Athlon PRO 200GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
