Comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and Intel Core i9-10900
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i9-10900 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a higher base speed of 4.1 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-10900's 2.8 GHz.
Intel Core i9-10900 has a higher turbo speed of 5.2 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 5.0 GHz.
Intel Core i9-10900 has more cores (10) compared to AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 8 cores.
Intel Core i9-10900 supports more threads (20) compared to AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 16 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket, while Intel Core i9-10900 uses the FCLGA1200 socket.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F was launched in Q2 2024, while Intel Core i9-10900 was launched in Q2 2020.
Intel Core i9-10900 has a larger L3 cache of 20 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 16 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and Intel Core i9-10900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a base speed of 4.1 GHz, while the Intel Core i9-10900 runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports a turbo speed of 5.0 GHz, compared to 5.2 GHz for the Intel Core i9-10900.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores, while the Intel Core i9-10900 has 10 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports 16 threads, compared to 20 threads for the Intel Core i9-10900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5, while the Intel Core i9-10900 uses the FCLGA1200.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F was launched on Q2 2024, while the Intel Core i9-10900 was released on Q2 2020.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to 20 MB for the Intel Core i9-10900.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Intel Core i9-10900
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
4.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
5.0 GHz
5.2 GHz
Cores
8
10
Threads
16
20
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
FCLGA1200
Launched
Q2 2024
Q2 2020
L3 Cache
16 MB
20 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F:
64%
Intel Core i9-10900:
50%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
45%
Intel Core i9-10900:
28%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i9-10900: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F : Q2 2024 ✅
Intel Core i9-10900 : Q2 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Intel Core i9-10900
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F was launched more recently (Q2 2024) compared to the Intel Core i9-10900 (Q2 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a higher base clock speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-10900's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3882, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms the Intel Core i9-10900 (score: 3028). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a higher CPU Mark score of 145.11 compared to the Intel Core i9-10900's 56.90. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 16 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900's 20 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Intel Core i9-10900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-10900 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.2 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 5.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10900 features a larger L3 cache of 20MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 16MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i9-10900 scores 19756, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's score of 31198. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i9-10900
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Core i9-10900
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i9-10900
The Intel Core i9-10900 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
