Comparison between AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and AMD A10-9700
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD A10-9700's 3.5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher turbo speed of 4.7 GHz compared to AMD A10-9700's 3.8 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has more cores (12) compared to AMD A10-9700's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports more threads (24) compared to AMD A10-9700's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Both CPUs use the same socket type: AM4.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT was launched in Q3 2020, while AMD A10-9700 was launched in Q4 2016.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a larger L3 cache of 64 MB compared to AMD A10-9700's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and AMD A10-9700 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the AMD A10-9700 runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports a turbo speed of 4.7 GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD A10-9700.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has 12 cores, while the AMD A10-9700 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports 24 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-9700.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT uses the AM4, while the AMD A10-9700 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT was launched on Q3 2020, while the AMD A10-9700 was released on Q4 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has 64 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-9700.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
AMD A10-9700
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
4.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
12
4
Threads
24
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM4
Launched
Q3 2020
Q4 2016
L3 Cache
64 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT:
45%
AMD A10-9700:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
47%
AMD A10-9700:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT: 105 watts
26.25%
AMD A10-9700: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT : Q3 2020 ✅
AMD A10-9700 : Q4 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
AMD A10-9700
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD A10-9700's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.7 GHz compared to the AMD A10-9700's 3.8 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2746, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the AMD A10-9700 (score: 1615). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT features a larger L3 cache of 64MB compared to the AMD A10-9700's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher CPU Mark score of 136.64 compared to the AMD A10-9700's 118.29. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher TDP of 105W compared to the AMD A10-9700's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD A10-9700 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A10-9700 was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT (Q3 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A10-9700 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT's 12 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-9700 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT's 24 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A10-9700 scores 3547, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT's score of 32658. This makes the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
This cpu Handles High End level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for High End level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-9700
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Ideal for High End level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and High End level computing.
AMD A10-9700
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is a reliable and High End processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with High End computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-9700
The AMD A10-9700 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
