Comparison between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.2 GHz.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 3.4 GHz.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has more cores (12) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 supports more threads (24) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 8 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the sTR4 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 was launched in Q3 2021, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 was launched in Q2 2017.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 8 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and AMD Ryzen 5 1400 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to 3.4 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 1400.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 12 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 supports 24 threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 1400.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the sTR4, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 was launched on Q3 2021, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 was released on Q2 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 1400.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Cores
12
4
Threads
24
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
sTR4
AM4
Launched
Q3 2021
Q2 2017
L3 Cache
32 MB
8 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920:
38%
AMD Ryzen 5 1400:
31%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
31%
AMD Ryzen 5 1400:
11%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920: 140 watts
35%
AMD Ryzen 5 1400: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 : Q3 2021 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 : Q2 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 (Q2 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 3.4 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2299, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 (score: 1893). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 8MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 172.22. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a higher TDP of 140W compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1400's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 12 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 has 8 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 24 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen 5 1400 scores 7750, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920's score of 22066. This makes the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
The AMD Ryzen 5 1400 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
