Comparison between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and AMD A10-9700
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to AMD A10-9700's 3.8 GHz.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has more cores (12) compared to AMD A10-9700's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X supports more threads (24) compared to AMD A10-9700's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses the sTR4 socket, while AMD A10-9700 uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X was launched in Q4 2018, while AMD A10-9700 was launched in Q4 2016.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to AMD A10-9700's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and AMD A10-9700 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD A10-9700 runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X supports a turbo speed of 4.3 GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD A10-9700.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 12 cores, while the AMD A10-9700 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X supports 24 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-9700.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses the sTR4, while the AMD A10-9700 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X was launched on Q4 2018, while the AMD A10-9700 was released on Q4 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-9700.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
AMD A10-9700
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
12
4
Threads
24
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
sTR4
AM4
Launched
Q4 2018
Q4 2016
L3 Cache
32 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X:
41%
AMD A10-9700:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
36%
AMD A10-9700:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: 180 watts
45%
AMD A10-9700: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X : Q4 2018 ✅
AMD A10-9700 : Q4 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
AMD A10-9700
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X was launched more recently (Q4 2018) compared to the AMD A10-9700 (Q4 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the AMD A10-9700's 3.8 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2489, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the AMD A10-9700 (score: 1615). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the AMD A10-9700's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has a higher TDP of 180W compared to the AMD A10-9700's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD A10-9700 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A10-9700 has a higher CPU Mark score of 118.29 compared to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 112.68. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A10-9700 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 12 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-9700 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 24 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A10-9700 scores 3547, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's score of 25365. This makes the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-9700
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD A10-9700
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-9700
The AMD A10-9700 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
