Comparison between AMD Sempron 240 and AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 240's 2.9 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 240's 3.3 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has more cores (6) compared to AMD Sempron 240's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X supports more threads (12) compared to AMD Sempron 240's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Sempron 240 uses the FM2 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Sempron 240 was launched in Q4 2018, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X was launched in Q2 2017.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Sempron 240's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Sempron 240 and AMD Ryzen 5 1600X are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Sempron 240 has a base speed of 2.9 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Sempron 240 supports a turbo speed of 3.3 GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X.
Cores: The AMD Sempron 240 has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD Sempron 240 supports threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Sempron 240 uses the FM2, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Sempron 240 was launched on Q4 2018, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X was released on Q2 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Sempron 240 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Sempron 240
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
3.3 GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
2
6
Threads
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2
AM4
Launched
Q4 2018
Q2 2017
L3 Cache
MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Sempron 240:
21%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X:
36%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Sempron 240
1%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X:
18%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Sempron 240: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Sempron 240 : Q4 2018 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X : Q2 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Sempron 240
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Pro's and Con's
AMD Sempron 240 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Sempron 240 was launched more recently (Q4 2018) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X (Q2 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Sempron 240 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Sempron 240 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron 240 scores 1278, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X's score of 13042. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 3.3 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2198, the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the AMD Sempron 240 (score: 1300). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Sempron 240's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a higher CPU Mark score of 190.67 compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 35.39. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Sempron 240
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Sempron 240
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Sempron 240
The AMD Sempron 240 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
