Comparison between Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core and Intel Celeron G470
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core is manufactured by Apple, while Intel Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron G470 has a higher base speed of 2.0 GHz compared to Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has more cores (20) compared to Intel Celeron G470's 1 cores.
Intel Celeron G470 supports more threads (2) compared to Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core uses the socket, while Intel Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket.
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core was launched in Q1 2022, while Intel Celeron G470 was launched in Q1 2014.
Intel Celeron G470 has a larger L3 cache of 0 MB compared to Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core and Intel Celeron G470 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Apple.
Speed: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has a base speed of GHz, while the Intel Celeron G470 runs at 2.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G470.
Cores: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has 20 cores, while the Intel Celeron G470 has 1 cores.
Threads: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G470.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core uses the , while the Intel Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155.
Launch Date: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core was launched on Q1 2022, while the Intel Celeron G470 was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has MB of L3 cache, compared to 0 MB for the Intel Celeron G470.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
Intel Celeron G470
Manufacturer
Apple
Intel
Speed
GHz
2.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
20
1
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
LGA1155
Launched
Q1 2022
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
MB
0 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core:
64%
Intel Celeron G470:
13%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
59%
Intel Celeron G470:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core: 60 watts
15%
Intel Celeron G470: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core : Q1 2022 ✅
Intel Celeron G470 : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
Intel Celeron G470
Pro's and Con's
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core was launched more recently (Q1 2022) compared to the Intel Celeron G470 (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3869, the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core outperforms the Intel Celeron G470 (score: 837). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G470's 16.20. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G470's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has a higher TDP of 60W compared to the Intel Celeron G470's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G470 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G470 has a higher base clock speed of 2.0 GHz compared to the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G470 features a larger L3 cache of 0MB compared to the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G470 has 1 cores, which is fewer than the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's 20 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G470 scores 570, which is lower than the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's score of 41255. This makes the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G470
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G470
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G470
The Intel Celeron G470 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
