Comparison between Intel 300 and AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Intel 300 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Sempron 3850 APU is manufactured by AMD.
Intel 300 has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 1.3 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU has more cores (4) compared to Intel 300's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while AMD Sempron 3850 APU uses the AM1,FS1b socket.
Intel 300 was launched in Q1 2024, while AMD Sempron 3850 APU was launched in Q2 2014.
Intel 300 has a larger L3 cache of 0 MB compared to AMD Sempron 3850 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel 300 and AMD Sempron 3850 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel 300 has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU runs at 1.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel 300 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Sempron 3850 APU.
Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel 300 supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Sempron 3850 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU uses the AM1,FS1b.
Launch Date: The Intel 300 was launched on Q1 2024, while the AMD Sempron 3850 APU was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel 300 has 0 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Sempron 3850 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel 300
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.9 GHz
1.3 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
AM1,FS1b
Launched
Q1 2024
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
0 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel 300:
53%
AMD Sempron 3850 APU:
7%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel 300
10%
AMD Sempron 3850 APU:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel 300: 46 watts
11.5%
AMD Sempron 3850 APU: 25 watts
6.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel 300 : Q1 2024 ✅
AMD Sempron 3850 APU : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel 300
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Pro's and Con's
Intel 300 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel 300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 1.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3235, the Intel 300 outperforms the AMD Sempron 3850 APU (score: 448). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel 300 features a larger L3 cache of 0MB compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel 300 has a higher CPU Mark score of 87.32 compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 24.31. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel 300 has a higher TDP of 46W compared to the AMD Sempron 3850 APU's 25W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Sempron 3850 APU was launched more recently (Q2 2014) compared to the Intel 300 (Q1 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron 3850 APU scores 1156, which is lower than the Intel 300's score of 7160. This makes the Intel 300 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel 300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel 300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel 300
The Intel 300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Sempron 3850 APU
The AMD Sempron 3850 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.