Comparison between Intel Celeron G3900T and AMD Athlon 5350 APU
Intel Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon 5350 APU is manufactured by AMD.
Intel Celeron G3900T has a higher base speed of 2.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 5350 APU's 2.1 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
AMD Athlon 5350 APU has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900T's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon 5350 APU supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900T's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G3900T uses the socket, while AMD Athlon 5350 APU uses the AM1,FS1B socket.
Intel Celeron G3900T was launched in Q2 2016, while AMD Athlon 5350 APU was launched in Q1 2014.
Intel Celeron G3900T has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD Athlon 5350 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G3900T and AMD Athlon 5350 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G3900T has a base speed of 2.6 GHz, while the AMD Athlon 5350 APU runs at 2.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G3900T supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon 5350 APU.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900T has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon 5350 APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900T supports 2 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon 5350 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G3900T uses the , while the AMD Athlon 5350 APU uses the AM1,FS1B.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G3900T was launched on Q2 2016, while the AMD Athlon 5350 APU was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3900T has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon 5350 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G3900T
AMD Athlon 5350 APU
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM1,FS1B
Launched
Q2 2016
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3900T:
26%
AMD Athlon 5350 APU:
11%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3900T
2%
AMD Athlon 5350 APU:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G3900T: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD Athlon 5350 APU: 25 watts
6.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G3900T : Q2 2016 ✅
AMD Athlon 5350 APU : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G3900T
AMD Athlon 5350 APU
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G3900T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G3900T was launched more recently (Q2 2016) compared to the AMD Athlon 5350 APU (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G3900T has a higher base clock speed of 2.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 5350 APU's 2.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1560, the Intel Celeron G3900T outperforms the AMD Athlon 5350 APU (score: 699). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3900T features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD Athlon 5350 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G3900T has a higher CPU Mark score of 17.96 compared to the AMD Athlon 5350 APU's 12.09. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 5350 APU's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900T has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 5350 APU's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G3900T has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the AMD Athlon 5350 APU's 25W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Athlon 5350 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon 5350 APU scores 1787, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G3900T's score of 2020. This makes the Intel Celeron G3900T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G3900T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon 5350 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G3900T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon 5350 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G3900T
The Intel Celeron G3900T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon 5350 APU
The AMD Athlon 5350 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
