Comparison between Intel Celeron G4950 and AMD Sempron 240
Intel Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Sempron 240 is manufactured by AMD.
Intel Celeron G4950 has a higher base speed of 3.3 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 240's 2.9 GHz.
AMD Sempron 240 has a higher turbo speed of 3.3 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G4950's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Intel Celeron G4950 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD Sempron 240's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G4950 uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD Sempron 240 uses the FM2 socket.
Intel Celeron G4950 was launched in Q1 2021, while AMD Sempron 240 was launched in Q4 2018.
Intel Celeron G4950 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD Sempron 240's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G4950 and AMD Sempron 240 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G4950 has a base speed of 3.3 GHz, while the AMD Sempron 240 runs at 2.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G4950 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.3 GHz for the AMD Sempron 240.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G4950 has 2 cores, while the AMD Sempron 240 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G4950 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Sempron 240.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G4950 uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD Sempron 240 uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G4950 was launched on Q1 2021, while the AMD Sempron 240 was released on Q4 2018.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4950 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Sempron 240.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G4950
AMD Sempron 240
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.3 GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
FM2
Launched
Q1 2021
Q4 2018
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4950:
34%
AMD Sempron 240:
21%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4950
3%
AMD Sempron 240:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G4950: 54 watts
13.5%
AMD Sempron 240: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G4950 : Q1 2021 ✅
AMD Sempron 240 : Q4 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G4950
AMD Sempron 240
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G4950 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G4950 has a higher base clock speed of 3.3 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2041, the Intel Celeron G4950 outperforms the AMD Sempron 240 (score: 1300). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4950 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD Sempron 240's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G4950 has a higher CPU Mark score of 43.00 compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 35.39. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Sempron 240 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Sempron 240 was launched more recently (Q4 2018) compared to the Intel Celeron G4950 (Q1 2021). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Sempron 240 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.3 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G4950's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Sempron 240 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G4950's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron 240 scores 1278, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G4950's score of 2714. This makes the Intel Celeron G4950 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Sempron 240 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G4950's 54W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G4950
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Sempron 240
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G4950
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Sempron 240
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G4950
The Intel Celeron G4950 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Sempron 240
The AMD Sempron 240 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
