Comparison between Intel Celeron G6900T and AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Intel Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G6900T's 2.8 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G6900T's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G6900T's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Celeron G6900T's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G6900T uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron G6900T was launched in Q3 2022, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 was launched in Q2 2020.
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Celeron G6900T's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G6900T and AMD Ryzen 3 3100 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G6900T has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G6900T supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 3 3100.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G6900T has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900T supports 2 threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD Ryzen 3 3100.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G6900T uses the FCLGA1700, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G6900T was launched on Q3 2022, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 was released on Q2 2020.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G6900T has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 3 3100.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G6900T
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.9 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
AM4
Launched
Q3 2022
Q2 2020
L3 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G6900T:
38%
AMD Ryzen 3 3100:
40%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G6900T
5%
AMD Ryzen 3 3100:
16%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G6900T: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD Ryzen 3 3100: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G6900T : Q3 2022 ✅
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 : Q2 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G6900T
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G6900T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G6900T was launched more recently (Q3 2022) compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 (Q2 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G6900T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 3100's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900T has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 3100's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G6900T scores 3919, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 3100's score of 11588. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G6900T's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G6900T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2419, the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the Intel Celeron G6900T (score: 2320). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Celeron G6900T's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 has a higher CPU Mark score of 160.99 compared to the Intel Celeron G6900T's 93.30. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G6900T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G6900T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G6900T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G6900T
The Intel Celeron G6900T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
