Comparison between Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD PRO A12-9800
Intel Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD PRO A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz.
AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.9 GHz.
AMD PRO A12-9800 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron J4025 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD PRO A12-9800's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron J4025 was launched in Q1 2020, while AMD PRO A12-9800 was launched in Q1 2017.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD PRO A12-9800 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD PRO A12-9800 runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD PRO A12-9800.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores, while the AMD PRO A12-9800 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD PRO A12-9800.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD PRO A12-9800 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4025 was launched on Q1 2020, while the AMD PRO A12-9800 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4025 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD PRO A12-9800.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4025
AMD PRO A12-9800
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
2.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
AM4
Launched
Q1 2020
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4025:
19%
AMD PRO A12-9800:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4025
2%
AMD PRO A12-9800:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4025: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD PRO A12-9800: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4025 : Q1 2020 ✅
AMD PRO A12-9800 : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4025
AMD PRO A12-9800
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4025 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J4025 was launched more recently (Q1 2020) compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD PRO A12-9800's 21.92. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD PRO A12-9800's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4025 scores 1477, which is lower than the AMD PRO A12-9800's score of 3705. This makes the AMD PRO A12-9800 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD PRO A12-9800 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A12-9800 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1686, the AMD PRO A12-9800 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4025 (score: 1147). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4025's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A12-9800 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4025
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD PRO A12-9800
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4025
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD PRO A12-9800
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4025
The Intel Celeron J4025 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD PRO A12-9800
The AMD PRO A12-9800 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
