Comparison between Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Celeron G3950
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron G3950 has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz.
Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher turbo speed of 2.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3950's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (2).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while Intel Celeron G3950 uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
Intel Celeron J4025 was launched in Q1 2020, while Intel Celeron G3950 was launched in Q1 2017.
Intel Celeron G3950 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to Intel Celeron J4025's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Celeron G3950 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3950 runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3950.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3950 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports 2 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3950.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090, while the Intel Celeron G3950 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4025 was launched on Q1 2020, while the Intel Celeron G3950 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4025 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3950.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Celeron G3950
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.0 GHz
Turbo
2.9 GHz
GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q1 2020
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4025:
19%
Intel Celeron G3950:
30%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4025
2%
Intel Celeron G3950:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4025: 10 watts
2.5%
Intel Celeron G3950: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4025 : Q1 2020 ✅
Intel Celeron G3950 : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Celeron G3950
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4025 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J4025 was launched more recently (Q1 2020) compared to the Intel Celeron G3950 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3950's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G3950's 16.24. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4025 scores 1477, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G3950's score of 2322. This makes the Intel Celeron G3950 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Intel Celeron G3950 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G3950 has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1851, the Intel Celeron G3950 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4025 (score: 1147). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3950 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G3950 has a higher TDP of 51W compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4025
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3950
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4025
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3950
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4025
The Intel Celeron J4025 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3950
The Intel Celeron G3950 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
