Comparison between Intel Celeron N5095 and AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Intel Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron N5095's 2.0 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to Intel Celeron N5095's 2.9 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Celeron N5095's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron N5095 uses the FCBGA1338 socket, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron N5095 was launched in Q3 2021, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X was launched in Q2 2020.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Celeron N5095's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron N5095 and AMD Ryzen 3 3300X are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron N5095 supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X.
Cores: The Intel Celeron N5095 has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron N5095 supports 4 threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron N5095 uses the FCBGA1338, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron N5095 was launched on Q3 2021, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X was released on Q2 2020.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron N5095
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
2.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1338
AM4
Launched
Q3 2021
Q2 2020
L3 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron N5095:
25%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X:
44%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron N5095
5%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X:
18%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron N5095: 15 watts
3.75%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron N5095 : Q3 2021 ✅
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X : Q2 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron N5095
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron N5095 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron N5095 was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X (Q2 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X's 120.38. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron N5095 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron N5095 scores 4075, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X's score of 12627. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron N5095's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron N5095's 2.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2673, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the Intel Celeron N5095 (score: 1502). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Celeron N5095's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron N5095's 15W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron N5095
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron N5095
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron N5095
The Intel Celeron N5095 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
