Comparison between Intel Celeron N5095A and AMD PRO A10-9700
Intel Celeron N5095A is manufactured by Intel, while AMD PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD PRO A10-9700 has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron N5095A's 2.0 GHz.
AMD PRO A10-9700 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron N5095A's 2.9 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Intel Celeron N5095A supports more threads (4) compared to AMD PRO A10-9700's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron N5095A uses the FCBGA1338 socket, while AMD PRO A10-9700 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron N5095A was launched in Q1 2022, while AMD PRO A10-9700 was launched in Q4 2016.
Intel Celeron N5095A has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD PRO A10-9700's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron N5095A and AMD PRO A10-9700 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095A has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD PRO A10-9700 runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD PRO A10-9700.
Cores: The Intel Celeron N5095A has 4 cores, while the AMD PRO A10-9700 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD PRO A10-9700.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron N5095A uses the FCBGA1338, while the AMD PRO A10-9700 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron N5095A was launched on Q1 2022, while the AMD PRO A10-9700 was released on Q4 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095A has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD PRO A10-9700.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron N5095A
AMD PRO A10-9700
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
2.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1338
AM4
Launched
Q1 2022
Q4 2016
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron N5095A:
25%
AMD PRO A10-9700:
27%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron N5095A
5%
AMD PRO A10-9700:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron N5095A: 15 watts
3.75%
AMD PRO A10-9700: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron N5095A : Q1 2022 ✅
AMD PRO A10-9700 : Q4 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron N5095A
AMD PRO A10-9700
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron N5095A – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095A features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD PRO A10-9700's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD PRO A10-9700's 21.53. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
AMD PRO A10-9700 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD PRO A10-9700 was launched more recently (Q4 2016) compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A (Q1 2022). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A10-9700 has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A10-9700 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A's 2.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1640, the AMD PRO A10-9700 outperforms the Intel Celeron N5095A (score: 1513). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A10-9700 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron N5095A's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A10-9700 scores 3639, which is lower than the Intel Celeron N5095A's score of 4110. This makes the Intel Celeron N5095A a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A10-9700 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A's 15W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron N5095A
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD PRO A10-9700
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron N5095A
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD PRO A10-9700
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron N5095A
The Intel Celeron N5095A is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD PRO A10-9700
The AMD PRO A10-9700 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
