Comparison between Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD Athlon X4 830
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon X4 830 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon X4 830 has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 830 has a higher turbo speed of 34.0 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's GHz.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has more cores (20) compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses the FCLGA1851 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K was launched in Q4 2024, while AMD Athlon X4 830 was launched in Q1 2018.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a larger L3 cache of 30 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 830's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD Athlon X4 830 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 830 runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 34.0 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 830.
Cores: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has 20 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 830 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 830.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses the FCLGA1851, while the AMD Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K was launched on Q4 2024, while the AMD Athlon X4 830 was released on Q1 2018.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has 30 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 830.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
AMD Athlon X4 830
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
GHz
3.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
34.0 GHz
Cores
20
4
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1851
FM2+
Launched
Q4 2024
Q1 2018
L3 Cache
30 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K:
80%
AMD Athlon X4 830:
21%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
85%
AMD Athlon X4 830:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: 125 watts
31.25%
AMD Athlon X4 830: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K : Q4 2024 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 830 : Q1 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
AMD Athlon X4 830
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4804, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 830 (score: 1292). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K features a larger L3 cache of 30MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a higher CPU Mark score of 155.10 compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's 14.34. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the AMD Athlon X4 830's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Athlon X4 830 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 830 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 34.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 830 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's 20 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 830 scores 2901, which is lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's score of 58937. This makes the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 830
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 830
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 830
The AMD Athlon X4 830 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
