Comparison between Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and AMD A10-8750
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A10-8750 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF's GHz.
AMD A10-8750 has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF's GHz.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has more cores (20) compared to AMD A10-8750's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the FCLGA1851 socket, while AMD A10-8750 uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF was launched in Q4 2024, while AMD A10-8750 was launched in Q3 2015.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has a larger L3 cache of 30 MB compared to AMD A10-8750's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and AMD A10-8750 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD A10-8750 runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD A10-8750.
Cores: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has 20 cores, while the AMD A10-8750 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-8750.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the FCLGA1851, while the AMD A10-8750 uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF was launched on Q4 2024, while the AMD A10-8750 was released on Q3 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has 30 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-8750.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
AMD A10-8750
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
20
4
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1851
FM2+
Launched
Q4 2024
Q3 2015
L3 Cache
30 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF:
82%
AMD A10-8750:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
85%
AMD A10-8750:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF: 125 watts
31.25%
AMD A10-8750: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF : Q4 2024 ✅
AMD A10-8750 : Q3 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
AMD A10-8750
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the AMD A10-8750 (Q3 2015). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4920, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms the AMD A10-8750 (score: 1509). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF features a larger L3 cache of 30MB compared to the AMD A10-8750's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the AMD A10-8750's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD A10-8750 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A10-8750 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A10-8750 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A10-8750 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF's 154.93. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A10-8750 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF's 20 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A10-8750 scores 3224, which is lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF's score of 58717. This makes the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-8750
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD A10-8750
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-8750
The AMD A10-8750 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
