Comparison between Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Celeron G3900
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher base speed of 2.8 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has more cores (24) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G3900 supports more threads (2) compared to Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the FCLGA1851 socket, while Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched in Q4 2024, while Intel Celeron G3900 was launched in Q1 2016.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a larger L3 cache of 36 MB compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Celeron G3900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base speed of GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3900 runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Cores: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 24 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the FCLGA1851, while the Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched on Q4 2024, while the Intel Celeron G3900 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 36 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Celeron G3900
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
24
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1851
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q4 2024
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
36 MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K:
84%
Intel Celeron G3900:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
98%
Intel Celeron G3900:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 125 watts
31.25%
Intel Celeron G3900: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K : Q4 2024 ✅
Intel Celeron G3900 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Celeron G3900
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 5084, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms the Intel Celeron G3900 (score: 1690). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K features a larger L3 cache of 36MB compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G3900's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G3900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher base clock speed of 2.8 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 134.42 compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's 86.65. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's 24 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900 scores 2148, which is lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's score of 68271. This makes the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3900
The Intel Celeron G3900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
