Comparison between Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Core i3-3250T
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-3250T has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has more cores (24) compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 2 cores.
Intel Core i3-3250T supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the FCLGA1851 socket, while Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155 socket.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched in Q4 2024, while Intel Core i3-3250T was launched in Q1 2016.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a larger L3 cache of 36 MB compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 3 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Core i3-3250T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base speed of GHz, while the Intel Core i3-3250T runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Cores: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 24 cores, while the Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the FCLGA1851, while the Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155.
Launch Date: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched on Q4 2024, while the Intel Core i3-3250T was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 36 MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-3250T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core i3-3250T
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
GHz
3.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
24
2
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1851
FCLGA1155
Launched
Q4 2024
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
36 MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K:
84%
Intel Core i3-3250T:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
98%
Intel Core i3-3250T:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 125 watts
31.25%
Intel Core i3-3250T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K : Q4 2024 ✅
Intel Core i3-3250T : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core i3-3250T
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 5084, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms the Intel Core i3-3250T (score: 1684). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K features a larger L3 cache of 36MB compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 3MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-3250T's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i3-3250T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-3250T has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-3250T has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's 86.65. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's 24 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-3250T scores 2650, which is lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's score of 68271. This makes the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-3250T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-3250T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-3250T
The Intel Core i3-3250T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
