Comparison between Intel Core i3-9300 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Intel Core i3-9300 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.7 GHz.
Intel Core i3-9300 has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 4.2 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i3-9300's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i3-9300 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Core i3-9300 was launched in Q3 2019, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was launched in Q4 2019.
Intel Core i3-9300 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i3-9300 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-9300 has a base speed of 3.7 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-9300 supports a turbo speed of 4.3 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-9300 has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-9300 supports 4 threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-9300 uses the FCLGA1151-2, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-9300 was launched on Q3 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was released on Q4 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-9300 has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i3-9300
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151-2
AM4
Launched
Q3 2019
Q4 2019
L3 Cache
8 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-9300:
42%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G:
38%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-9300
10%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G:
13%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i3-9300: 62 watts
15.5%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i3-9300 : Q3 2019 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G : Q4 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i3-9300
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i3-9300 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-9300 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 4.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2561, the Intel Core i3-9300 outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G (score: 2302). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-9300 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-9300 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-9300 scores 7137, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's score of 9081. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the Intel Core i3-9300 (Q3 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-9300's 29.51. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-9300's 62W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core i3-9300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i3-9300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i3-9300
The Intel Core i3-9300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
