Comparison between Intel Core i5-9600 and AMD FX-4320
Intel Core i5-9600 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-9600's 3.1 GHz.
Intel Core i5-9600 has a higher turbo speed of 4.6 GHz compared to AMD FX-4320's 4.2 GHz.
Intel Core i5-9600 has more cores (6) compared to AMD FX-4320's 4 cores.
Intel Core i5-9600 supports more threads (6) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i5-9600 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket.
Intel Core i5-9600 was launched in Q3 2019, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016.
Intel Core i5-9600 has a larger L3 cache of 9 MB compared to AMD FX-4320's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i5-9600 and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i5-9600 has a base speed of 3.1 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i5-9600 supports a turbo speed of 4.6 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
Cores: The Intel Core i5-9600 has 6 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i5-9600 supports 6 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i5-9600 uses the FCLGA1151-2, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i5-9600 was launched on Q3 2019, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-9600 has 9 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i5-9600
AMD FX-4320
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.1 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
4.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
6
4
Threads
6
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151-2
AM3+
Launched
Q3 2019
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
9 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i5-9600:
45%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i5-9600
15%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i5-9600: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i5-9600 : Q3 2019 ✅
AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i5-9600
AMD FX-4320
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i5-9600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i5-9600 was launched more recently (Q3 2019) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i5-9600 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.6 GHz compared to the AMD FX-4320's 4.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2732, the Intel Core i5-9600 outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-9600 features a larger L3 cache of 9MB compared to the AMD FX-4320's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-9600's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i5-9600's 104.06. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-9600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-9600's 6 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-9600's score of 10406. This makes the Intel Core i5-9600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Core i5-9600's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core i5-9600
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i5-9600
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i5-9600
The Intel Core i5-9600 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-4320
The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
